Journal of Educational Change and Innovation employs a double-blind peer review process to ensure fairness, transparency, and quality of published research.
Objectivity and Constructive Feedback
Evaluate manuscripts based on originality, significance, methodological rigor, clarity, and relevance to the journal’s focus.
Provide constructive, unbiased, and professional feedback.
Confidentiality
Treat all submitted manuscripts as confidential.
Do not share or use any information from the manuscript for personal or professional advantage.
Conflict of Interest
Declare any potential conflicts of interest related to the manuscript.
Recuse oneself if a conflict may compromise objectivity.
Timeliness
Complete the review within the requested timeframe.
Notify the editorial office promptly if unable to meet the deadline.
Ethical Considerations
Identify any ethical concerns, including plagiarism, duplicate publication, or unethical research practices.
Reviewers are encouraged to provide clear, specific comments that will help authors improve the manuscript.
Recommendations for decision may include: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.
The journal values reviewers’ contributions and considers peer review a vital part of maintaining academic integrity and research quality.
| :: People :: |
| Editorial Team |
| Reviewers |
| Contact |
| :: Policies :: |
| Focus and Scope |
| Peer Review Process |
| Publication Frequency |
| Open Access Policy |
| Archiving |
| Posting Article Policy |
| Publication Ethics Statement |
| Screening for Plagiarism |
| Withdrawal of Manuscript |
| Correction and Retraction |
| Article Processing Charge |
| Indexing and Abstracting |
| :: Submission :: |
| Author Guidelines |
| Reviewer Guidelines |
| Copyright Notice |
| Privacy Statement |
| Manuscript Template |
